The most striking detail coming out of Lil Durk’s recently concluded murder-for-hire trial may not be about Durk himself.
It’s about the man who took the stand against him, a cooperating witness known as OTF Jam, who could now be facing the possibility of life in prison for his own criminal exposure.
OTF Jam, whose legal name is Kacey Hester, was one of the prosecution’s key witnesses in the federal case against Durk, born Durk Banks.
Hester testified about his own involvement in the August 2022 shooting in Los Angeles that killed Saviay’a “Lul Pab” Robinson, the cousin of rapper Quando Rondo.

Prosecutors alleged that the shooting was part of a murder-for-hire plot targeting Quando Rondo, whose real name is Tyquian Bowman.
The government’s theory was that the alleged attack was motivated by the 2020 killing of Durk’s close friend, King Von, by an associate of Rondo. The intended target survived, but Lul Pab was killed in the attack.
Hester’s testimony put him in a complicated legal position. During the trial, he admitted taking part in the shooting and described his alleged relationship with Durk, while the defense repeatedly challenged his credibility and motives for cooperating with federal prosecutors.
According to prosecutors during closing arguments, Hester had originally faced a much shorter potential sentence on a gun charge before his cooperation and admissions about other killings significantly increased his legal exposure.
He could now potentially face life in prison, making the consequences of his testimony a major part of the story surrounding the case.
For Durk’s defense, that exposure was central to the argument that cooperating witnesses had strong incentives to implicate him. Defense attorneys repeatedly questioned whether Hester and other government witnesses were telling prosecutors what they wanted to hear in exchange for leniency.
Prosecutors, however, relied heavily on testimony from people who had been closely connected to Durk and the alleged operation.
The government argued that their accounts, along with other evidence presented during the trial, supported its case against the rapper.
Durk ultimately maintained his innocence and was acquitted of all charges in the federal murder-for-hire case on September 11. The jury found him not guilty of conspiracy, stalking resulting in death and murder-for-hire charges related to the attack targeting Quando Rondo.
Durk’s acquittal, however, does not resolve Hester’s separate legal situation. OTF Jam’s own criminal exposure remains an unresolved issue, particularly after he admitted his involvement in the Los Angeles shooting and provided testimony for the government.

The case also highlights one of the risks faced by cooperating witnesses in major federal prosecutions: cooperation can potentially reduce a defendant’s exposure, but it does not necessarily eliminate the possibility of a severe sentence, especially when the witness makes admissions involving additional crimes.
For OTF Jam, the next chapter may now be just as consequential as his testimony was inside the courtroom.
With Durk acquitted in the murder-for-hire case, attention could shift toward what prosecutors ultimately seek in Hester’s own case and whether his cooperation will result in any meaningful benefit.
For now, the legal consequences facing OTF Jam remain uncertain, while Lil Durk has moved on from one of the most closely watched federal trials in hip-hop.

Error in the story. lil Tim wasn’t the one killed
They were on trial for accidentally killing Lul Pab, not Lul Tim. They are two entirely different people. Lul Tim is Quando Rondo’s friend who shot King Von. Lul Pab is Quando Rondo’s cousin who was mistakenly killed when they tried to get Quando Rondo. Do you even have editors?
You’re absolutely right. That was a serious editorial error on our end. We incorrectly identified Lul Tim as the victim when the case involved an alleged plot targeting Quando Rondo that resulted in the death of his cousin, Lul Pab.
We’ve corrected the article and reviewed the surrounding copy to make sure the distinction between Lul Pab and Lul Tim is accurate throughout.
Thanks for flagging this.