Lil Durk Hit With Racketeering Charges Ahead of Murder-for-Hire Trial

By
DancehallMag Team
DancehallMag is the leading independent publication covering Dancehall and Reggae music, the artists, and culture since 2019.

The most surprising part of the new federal case against Lil Durk isn’t the murder-for-hire charges he’s been fighting for a while now. It’s that prosecutors are now arguing he ran a full criminal enterprise, one where appearing in his music videos was allegedly a reward for committing violence.

A superseding indictment filed on June 3 added two new counts to the existing case. The first accuses Durk and several co-defendants of operating a racketeering enterprise built around two things: orchestrating violence against rivals and funding drug distribution in Chicago and Georgia to secure loyalty from crew members.

The second new count reframes the original murder-for-hire charge entirely. Prosecutors have always said Durk ordered a hit on rapper Quando Rondo that ended up killing Rondo’s cousin, Saviay’a Robinson, in 2022. Now they’re calling it a “murder in aid of racketeering,” which ties the killing directly to the alleged enterprise.

Durk’s lawyers moved fast to push back. They asked the judge to either toss the racketeering charges outright or split them into a separate trial, arguing the new counts unfairly tangle together old, unrelated incidents with the current case.

Those old incidents are a big part of what makes this development so complicated. Prosecutors are leaning heavily on two past events to establish that Durk leads a criminal organization, one from 2019 and one from early 2022, both of which were never prosecuted.

The 2019 case involves a shooting in Atlanta that allegedly included both Durk and the late King Von. The story prosecutors tell is that a man named Anthony Weatherspoon sold a stolen car to someone in Durk’s crew, refused to give the money back, and was subsequently robbed and shot in the leg. A police detective at the time testified he saw video of Durk firing during the incident and that eyewitnesses placed both rappers at the scene.

Nothing came of it for either rapper. Von was killed in 2020, and Durk’s charges were dropped in 2022, possibly because the same detective noted Weatherspoon may have fired first, leaving room for a self-defense argument.

The 2022 incident is more layered and connects to Chicago’s decades-long war between the Black Disciples and Gangster Disciples. Prosecutors say Durk is aligned with the Black Disciples, and that after his brother Dontay Banks Jr., known as DThang, was shot and killed in June 2021 by a Gangster Disciples faction called Dump Street, Durk began offering money for anyone who killed those responsible, and more broadly, for any Gangster Disciple killed.

That alleged bounty, prosecutors claim, led to the murder of Stephon Mack, a GD leader with ties to Dump Street, who was shot leaving a Youth Peace Center in Chicago. The two men who pleaded guilty to killing Mack both admitted there was a cash bounty involved, though neither named Durk specifically.

Lil Durk
Lil Durk

What prosecutors do have are text messages. About two weeks after the killing, the two men exchanged texts referencing Durk, OTF, and payment. In one message from February 18, 2022, one of them asks the other directly, “Did durk gave u that money.” Around that same time, Durk appeared on the Million Dollaz Worth of Game podcast carrying what looked like a million dollars in cash. The FBI agent whose affidavit detailed all of this never made the connection explicit, but the implication was hard to miss.

Durk’s legal team has pushed back hard on the evidentiary foundation here. They’ve described the case against their client as built on “circumstantial evidence” with “no direct witnesses,” and they’ve framed the racketeering addition as an attempt to bring in old, unresolved matters that were never charged for a reason.

The tension between those two positions, prosecutors building a pattern across years and incidents, and the defense arguing that pattern is constructed rather than real, is likely to define the next phase of this case. The trial has not yet started, and with the racketeering motion still pending before the judge, the shape of what actually goes in front of a jury is still very much up in the air.

In This Story:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment